Image Image Image Image Image

CosmosUp | August 15, 2022

Scroll to top



Colonize Mars: Can This Dream Come True?

By | On + -
Colonize Mars: Can This Dream Come True?

It’s one of the most familiar places in the solar system, near 24 hour day-cycles, mountains, valleys even liquid water. With so much in common with Earth you’d think Mars could be a second home for the human race, but you’d be wrong! Mars is a violent, inhospitable wasteland with nature firmly against you at every turn. But with that said, could humans live on Mars?

From orbit, one thing is known for sure… Mars is dry. Although there is water ice and possibly even some flowing water, compared to Earth, Mars is a global desert. Not only is it dry, it’s also absolutely freezing cold — on the hottest days on the hardest parts of the planet temperatures can reach as high as 70 degrees Fahrenheit (21°C), that’s actually not bad.

But considering the average temperature of the planet is negative 52 degrees Fahrenheit (-46°C) and with winter temperatures at the polls dropping to a bitter negative 225 degrees Fahrenheit (-142°C), most of the planet is in a perpetual state of frigid hostility.

Humans can survive in cold climates, however. The average temperature of Antarctica is about negative 57 degrees Fahrenheit (-50°C) — which is actually cooler than the average temperature of Mars and we have a sustainable camp there, so, although it won’t be easy to stay warm on the martian surface, it is technically possible with current and near-future technologies. But still, you’ll have to plan your landing site accordingly.

Entering the atmosphere of Mars introduces a unique problem. The martian atmosphere is extremely thin. This means that air-resistance for entering spacecraft have less help slowing down as they descend to the surface. But this also means that there is little to no oxygen to breathe. In fact, the atmosphere is only about 0.14% oxygen compared to the 21% seen on Earth. There is light at the end of the tunnel, however.

A chemical called perchlorate is found in high concentrations on the surface of Mars. This molecule consists of one chlorine atom and 4 oxygen atoms. Some oxygen atoms can be stripped away and collected giving the astronauts a possible source of breathable air inside the habitat.

On the downside, perchlorate is extremely toxic to humans. When it’s absorbed, it interferes with metabolic functions… this leads to poor temperature regulation, sleeping disorders and certain blood diseases. Today, there is no guaranteed way to keep this chemical dust from entering a habitat and into the lungs of any human inside.

However, if there is a way to safely live in an environment with perchlorate then it can be leveraged as an enviable resource for the crew.

  One of the biggest dangers for anyone living on Mars is radiation because the Earth has an active iron-core, a strong magnetic field is generated. This magnetic field shields the planet from harmful radiation, not only from the Sun but also from violent distant activity from deep space.

In fact, in 2004 the largest single ray gamma blast impacted Earth from a Magnetar about 50,000 light-years away. It released more energy in one tenth of a second than our sun has released in one hundred thousand years. Unfortunately Mars has little to no magnetic field, so it’s almost completely exposed to the elements from space.

Still, during a standard 180 days journey to Mars, the astronauts would have absorbed the same levels of radiation as a nuclear power plant worker will in a 15 year career. Once on the planet, the crew would continue to receive a constant low dose of radiation increasing their risk of cancer further. Even with advanced shielding technologies and the Earth’s magnetic field, radiation still poses a great risk for the crew on the International Space Station.

Therefore, until radiation shielding techniques advance further, living on Mars will have to be scaled back to only a short visit. It isn’t until you look at Mars, a seemingly earth-like planet that you realize just how narrow the habitability zone for humans actually is.

Although we have technologies to get humans to Mars, on a planet that’s one and a half times further away from the Sun than Earth… and 225 million kilometers from Earth… with toxic soil, a scarce water supply and dust storms the size of North America you have to question whether it’s even worth it.

For some, it will be. And in the next 20 to 30 years the technology will be in a place to help support human life on the planet, but today, it is simply too far away and too hostile for a sustainable human colony on the red planet. Sorry folks, you’re just gonna have to wait a little bit longer.



  1. Asteroid Miner

    Please read this book: “Radiation and Reason, The impact of Science on a culture of fear” by Wade Allison.
    Professor Allison says we can take up to 10 rems per month, a little more than 1000 times the present “legal” limit. The old limit was 5 rems/lifetime. A single dose of 800 rems could kill you, but if you have time to recover between doses of 10 rems, no problem. It is like donating blood: You see “4 gallon donor” stickers on cars. You know they didn’t give 4 gallons all at once. There is a threshold just over 10 rems. You are getting .35 rems/year NATURAL background radiation right where you are right now.

    Divide 5 rems by your present Natural Background Radiation. For Americans, Natural Background Radiation is at least .35 rems/year. Our Natural Background Radiation uses up our 5 rems/lifetime when we are 14 years old.

    X-ray technicians must be required to receive anti-X-rays! :) :)

  2. brett thevenot

    What is the current cost/lb to get material to escape velocity?

    Leaving aside the facts that environments outside of “Earth normal” are pretty much lethal across the board, and that we probably won’t develop the necessary propulsion tech before we crash Earth’s climate, the real question is how much does it cost to move a livable environment and the materials necessary for self-sufficiency to an acceptable area?

    Can that even be done in this solar system?

    The most reasonable would be to establish a base on Luna first, after we establish a better orbital base, and then hop-skip out on to Mars and beyond, building bases/orbitals as we go.

    But does anyone really see this happening?

    I mean, sure, go Elon go, but come on. Is it reasonable to think this can be done by anything other than a NASA-like budget?

Leave a Comment

Comments Feed

You can use these tags in comments<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> (Need help with these tags?)  

© 2022 CosmosUp, INC. All Rights Reserved.